Education 1918-79 - Creating a Welfare State 1918 - 1979
Early 20th Century
· Provision for formal education only became
compulsory in England and Wales in 1880
· Previously where schools had existed they had
been provided by the church, charities and private foundations
· The state began providing some funding to ‘fill
the gaps’ from 1870 onwards, including new ‘board schools’ (basically state
schools)
· Private grammar schools and prestigious public
schools prepared boys for uni
· Most schools only provided primary education
1902 Education Act
· In exchange for state funding 1,000 grammar
schools agreed to offer 25% of places to non-fee students who passed an exam
· However by 1914 only 56 out of every 1000
elementary school students gained a place
1918 ‘Fisher’ Education Act
·
The act
aimed to widen access to education by:
–
Increasing
the school leaving age to 14
–
Providing
nursery school to toddlers and ‘contribution schools’ for new workers aged 14+
to continue their studies 1 day a week
–
Scrapping
fees for elementary education
·
The Act
also punished those who employed school children and provided free, compulsory
health checks for secondary pupils
·
However
few nursery & contribution schools were actually provided due to the Geddes
Axe cuts in 1922
1926 Haddow Report
·
Recommended
elementary schools be replaced with primary schools for ages 5-11
·
Recommended
implementing a tripartite system of grammar, modern and technical schools
·
Nothing
was done to act on the report until the 1944 Butler Act
40’s onwards
1944 Butler Education Act
· Aimed to tackle the giant of ‘ignorance’
· School leaving age increased to 15 in 1947
· Secondary education made free and universal
· Education would follow the tripartite model of
the Haddow Report; pupils would take the 11+ exam and their results would
determine whether they went to a grammar, secondary modern or secondary
technical school
o
Technical
schools specialised in mechanical and technical education, very few of these
schools were established because they were costly to run and only 5% of
students attended these schools
o
Modern
schools gave a general education. 70% of students went to these schools.
Students would normally leave these schools at 15 with a Certificate of
Education.
o
Grammar
schools provided a highly academic education, they were usually single-sex. 20%
of pupils went to grammar schools. Most stayed until 16 to take O-level exams,
some then took A-levels and some then went on to university.
· The authors of the act hoped there would be
‘parity of esteem’ between pupils of the different types of school
· In reality, grammar schools had 3x the
resources of secondary moderns, and the 11+ came to be seen as a pass/fail
test, with those who did not ‘pass’ condemned to inferior education at a
secondary modern.
The Crosland Circular 1965
· Between 1960 and 1979 there was large debate on
whether comprehensive schools should replace the tripartite system (often
ironically referred to as the tripartheid system) as a fairer and more equal
form of education
· By 1964 10% of all pupils were educated in
comprehensive schools, which accepted pupils of all abilities
· In 1965 Labour Education Secretary Anthony
Crosland issued a document, known as the Crosland Circular, calling for
universal comprehensive education
· In 1966 the government issues a document stating
that funding for schools would only go to LEA’s that adopted comprehensive
reform
· The argument for comprehensive schools was
popular with teachers unions and middle-class parents
· By 1979 90% of students were educated at
comprehensive schools
Arguments
for comprehensive education
|
Arguments
against comprehensive education
|
•
Grammar schools had 3x the resources of secondary
modern schools. This did not promote ‘parity’ as promised in the 1944
Education Act.
•
In the 1960s many secondary modern schools were
already run-down. Comprehensive reform would help many children to avoid
these poor schools
•
Pupils who failed the 11-plus were condemned to a
life of fewer opportunities: only two percent of those who failed the exam
were still in school at the age of 17
•
The 11-plus favoured middle-class children over
working-class children: very few children from working class areas passed the
exam
•
The majority of the public wanted to scrap the 11+
|
• Many grammar schools were excellent and
produced highly successful students
• Grammar schools were seen as a precious
opportunity for social advancement by many working class families with bright
children
• In 1975, the government forced direct grant
grammar schools to go comprehensive. Many went independent instead; free
placed were removed and poorer local parents could not afford the fees
• The rise of more private schools in place of
grammar schools led to a system that promotes less social equality
• The majority of the public wanted to keep
grammar schools
|
The 1967
Plowden Report
The 1967 Plowden Report was a report
on primary schools that promoted more liberal teaching methods and progressive
reforms like:
•
A large
programme of nursery school building
•
More
project-based work in primary schools, rather than teacher led activities
•
A focus on
learning through play in the early years of teaching
•
The
teaching of grammar and punctuation was seen as a hindrance to creativity and a
threat to progress
Some schools took these liberal
reforms to extremes, a move which worried parents:
•
Schools
introduced relaxed discipline, no uniform and teachers were to be called by
their first names
•
In the
William Tyndale Junior School in north London, pupils could choose which
classes to attend and could watch television or play table tennis if they
didn’t feel like studying
•
Some
secondary schools also began adopting the recommendations of the Plowden report
•
Parents
became worried about ‘trendy teachers’ and a lack of discipline in schools
Other important reform:
•
GCS - only 20% of student took O-levels, the rest left school with no
qualifications. The CSE was introduced in 1965 and students would be streamed
into CSE of O-level classes. Though the CSE was seen as an inferior
qualification, it offered more subjects and meant student left with some form
of qualification.
•
The 1973 Education Act - raised the school leaving age to 16 and allow
LEAs to set up work experience in place of lessons for final-year student, this
helped students gain employment in the tough economic climate of the 70s
•
More students went to university - this was a result of extra government funding
to boost the number of placed at new universities. Some universities dropped
the requirement for applicants to have O-level Latin, thereby increasing
application from comprehensive schools
University 1918-1979
Before the Robbins
Committee report
•
Rising
number of secondary school pupils and the growing government recognition of the
economic value of education led to the growth of university education in
Britain
•
Government
funding for universities had increased from £1 million in 1919 to over £80
million in 1962
•
Between
1920 and 1950 the proportion of university costs met by students fees fell from
1/3rd to 1/8th as
bursaries became more commonplace
•
In 1962
local authorities were compelled to give an allowance or ‘grant’ to enable
students to concentrate on their studies
•
The
increase in student numbers received a major boost after WW2; the 1900 there
were around 20 000 student, this rose to 38 000 in 1938 and 113 000 in 1962
•
Oxford and
Cambridge dominated university education: In 1939 they educated 22% of students
•
Universities
tended to cater more to classics and arts, then to science
•
The
University of London grew hugely in the 20th century: it had 13 000
students in 1939 and 23 000 in 1963
•
London
increasingly specialised in STEM subjects
•
Some
smaller universities founded by larger ones became fully independent (Reading,
Nottingham)
•
However
university was still out of reach for the vast majourity of people; the
proportion of 18-21 years olds at university only increased from 0.8% to 4%
between 1900 and 1962 - in contrast in the US 50% of that age group went to
university
•
Only 13%
of students at Oxbridge were female
The Robbins Report
1963
•
Made as
the baby-boomer generation was approaching the end of secondary education
•
Report
recommended:
–
A
universal national grant be provided to all students with a university place
–
There
should be a large increase in state funding to increase the number of
university places
•
The advice
was acted upon
•
Between
1962 and 1970 the number of universities increased from 22 to 46
•
In 1964
Labour created the CNAA, which allowed non-universities to award degrees: 34
technology colleges elevated their status to polytechnics which offered
vocational degrees (although these degrees were seen as inferior)
•
The CNAA
also enabled the launch of the Open University in 1969; mainly aimed at adults
•
Between
1970 and 1983 the number of students increased from 185 000 to 237 000 (however
this was still far lower than other industrial nations)
•
Better
access to university education increased social mobility and resulted in a more highly educated workforce
- the number of people who could demand higher salaries for skilled work
increased
•
There was
also less pressure to leave school at a young age
Comments
Post a Comment