Welfare Support 1918/79 - Creating a Welfare State 1918 - 1979
Pre-1918
- Poor laws - welfare aid given in form of money or
necessities to those in need.
- Usually
the old, the young, the sick and the poor.
- First
three were seen as ‘deserving’ poor, rightly cared for by the relatives,
the church, private organisations and increasingly the state.
- Until
the end of the 19th century, healthy people of working age
who fell into destitution were often seen as morally at fault - the ‘undeserving’ poor - they were
housed in workhouses, where conditions were deliberately terrible to
discourage the able bodied from poverty
- The
process of having to prove that you ‘deserved’ welfare was a hated,
humiliating experience.
From
1908 the liberal government inaugurated a huge expansion of state-provided
welfare:
- These
new mechanism were open to all who qualified with no distinction between
‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor.
The
1911 National Insurance Act expanded welfare:
·
Employers,
employees and the government would contribute to the insurance scheme
·
Provided
benefits and healthcare through the funds generated
·
However
this scheme was only available to low paid workers earning less than £160 a
year, only applied to 6 industries when created, and did not insure workers
families
1917 Ministry of Construction
• After WW1 it was largely accepted that the
government had a role to play in insuring individuals had basic security
•
The
Liberal government promised a ‘home fit for heroes’
• The Ministry of Reconstruction was established
to build a better Britain after the wars
Interwar years
Unemployment
Unemployment was the most pressing issues for
interwar governments - It was never below 1 million between the end of the
1920s and mid- 40's (around 10% of the workforce) and peaked at over 3 million
in the early 1930's.
However there was continuous conflict between
supporting the unemployed and balancing the books.
Problems
with the National Insurance Scheme….
- The self-funding National insurance scheme
implemented by the 1911 National Insurance Act was undermined by the war as
many of the 3.5 million returning troops were not eligible for the
benefits provided.
- This was because they had not worked in
one of the specified industries or had not made sufficient contributions.
- The wartime coalition realised that a
difficult solution was developing, the national insurance scheme would
need to be redesigned and the unemployed couldn’t be left to rely on old
Poor law.
‘Out-of-work donation’ 1918-20
·
The short
term solution, to help returning troops and civilian unemployed, was to issue
dole money but under the name ' the out of work donation' (1918-1920)
·
Issued to
remaining troops and then civilian unemployed until they found work.
- Was paid out of taxation/ borrowin) with
no link to individual contributions
·
It was
meant to be temporary, it set 2 important precedents
·
The
government accepted the duty to adequately support unemployed, regardless of
insurance contributions.
·
It
provided more money for family dependents
1920 Unemployment Insurance Act
·
Unemployed
Insurance Act was developed to offer a longer-term solution and cover those not
employed by the National Insurance Act
·
2/3
workers were eligible to claim insurance
·
The act
was passed in the 1920's just as the effect of the post war slump were setting
in.
·
Rather
than creating a self-funding system, the greater number of eligible claimants
quickly drained the accumulated funds.
·
By 1921
the government was forced to make 'extended' or 'uncovenanted' payments; these
were meant to be paid for through worker contributions from future employment
were dole payments disguised as insurance.
·
They made
this law as the Poor law could not cope with the scale of the problem and
ministers feared a revolution if the unemployed were not supported.
·
Government
already pressured, 2.4 million workers had taken part in strikes over pay and
conditions in 1919.
·
Attempts
were made to limit the expense, a seeking work test was implemented March 1921
·
By March
1930, 3 million claims had been rejected because of the test.
1929 Local Government Act
·
The local
government act said that county and borough council had to set up Public
Assistance committees (PAC's).
·
They were
central funded and replace the poor law guardians who had administered funds
under the old poor law.
·
In
response to the financial crisis of 1931, the PAC's were given the power to
administer means test to claimants
·
Their
combined household income was thoroughly investigated to judge eligibility for
dole payments.
·
The means
test was hated as it was seen as an invasion of privacy and unfair, as some
PAC's were more stringent than others.
1934
Unemployment Act
·
The
unemployment act separated the treatment of insurable from long-term
employment.
·
Part 1 of
the act provided 26 weeks of benefit payments to the 14.5 million workers who
had paid into the scheme
·
Part 2
created a national Unemployment Assistance Board (UAB) to help those with no
entitlement to insurance benefits.
·
By 1937
the UAB had assisted 1 million people on a national means-tested basis.
·
By this
point the Poor Law provisions shrunk to just a few groups not covered by the
UAB; these included widows who could not yet claim a pension and deserted
wives.
HOWEVER….
·
The
government had not been able to solve unemployment largely because the prevailing
wisdom of retrenchment (spending cuts and tax rises) could not stimulate
economic growth.
·
It was
only when huge state spending was poured into rearmament after 1936 that
persistent unemployment was finally tackled.
Pensions
1908 Pensions Act
- State pensions were introduced
- It was hugely popular with the eligible
over -70's
- There were criticisms that they were
means-tested and did not support the widows and children of the deceased.
1925 Widows’, Orphans' and Old Age Contributory pensions act.
- Brought in by Neville Chamberlain-
minister for health
- Addressed criticisms of the 1908 Pensions
Act
- Provided a pension of 10 shillings a week
for those aged 65-70 and provided for widows, their children and orphans.
- It was funded by a compulsory contribution
rather than taxation
- This was initially unpopular with the Labour
party, they felt it unfairly penalised the poor
- Tough economic conditions and an aging
population led to it general acceptance
- Self-employed workers of both sexes were
allowed to join the scheme in 1937
Housing
Why was reform needed?
- Local and national governments made
efforts to improve housing since the mid-Victorian era.
- Concern that slums promoted crime and
disease.
- Lots of slum clearances took place before
1918
- Major improvements in urban living
standards were achieved by the introduction of mains water and sewage to
homes.
- As late as 1899, only a quarter of houses
in Manchester had flushing toilets compare to the 98% by 1914.
- Government had promised returning troops '
a home fit for heroes'.
1919 Housing and Town Planning Act
- The 1919 Housing and Town Planning Act
aimed to empower local authorities to use central government funds to meet
housing needs
- It was estimated that over 600,000 houses
would have to be built to meet demand
- Only 213,000 were actually constructed
before the onset of the recession lead to the 'Geddes axe' (1922 Geddes
axe led to cuts in spending on education, pensions, unemployment benefit
housing and health from £206 million to £182 million. also prompted cuts in
defence)
- As a result the housing shortage grew
worse with an estimated shortfall of 822,000 houses in 1923.
- A consequence of this was young married
couples living with their parents
Conservative and Labour Housing Acts 1923 and 1924, Labour Housing Act
1930
- Conservative and Labour Housing acts in
1923 and 1924 respectively sought to use subsidies to encourage the
construction of private and state-owned housing.
- These and the further Labour housing act
in 1930 promoted a great deal of house building between 1919 and 1940.
- Four million homes were built in total,
with one million built by the public sector.
- The 1930 Act used state funds to rehouse
people living in overcrowded cities; most were built in large cities.
- Between 1924 and 1939, 20 'cottage estates'
were created on the outskirts of London. These were new suburbs connected
the centre by rail.
- While the quality of housing was much
improved some projects were not properly thought through.
- At the huge Becontree estate (25,800
houses and flats) a lack of local jobs nearly led to disaster, which was
only avoided thanks to the construction of a new ford car factory nearby
in 1931.
- With the new homes came not only indoor
plumbing and gardens but also increased demand for domestic goods such as
new furniture, which further stimulated the economy and helped raise the
average standard of living
Impact of WW2
The impact of the Second World War, the Labour
Gov
The impact of total war on social welfare:
·
WW2 lead
to wide consensus that welfare provision needed a radical overhaul
·
A
political will developed to iron out the unfairness and inconsistency of the
system
·
There were
several reasons for this shift in attitudes among politicians and the general
public:
o
A total
war, which affected all, had prompted total solutions such as universal
rationing and the provision of communal bomb shelters; the success of which
gave a boost to Universalist as opposed to selective solutions.
o
The
sacrifices made during the war lead to the public expecting a just reward.
There was several discussions of the fair shares that should continue into
peacetimes.
o
The
evacuation of city children to the countryside openly showed the extent of the
poverty. This contributed to the acceptance of the need for change.
o
The
success of a state directed war economy increased political and popular belief
in the political state intervention to improve peoples' lives after the war.
o
The war
forced government to borrow and spend large sums of money in pursuit of
victory. Keynes’s economic views had been proved to work
o
The war
forced a wartime government and led to a greater deal of co-operation over
war-time policy. White papers of 1944 was the basis of the 1946 National
Insurance Act, helped to promote conservative acceptance of act.
The Beveridge report (December 1942)
William Beveridge was a liberal politician with
an interest in social reform. In June 1941 he was appointed to head government
committee to investigate welfare provisions and recommend improvements.
Why was the report set up?
- Set up on Churchill's request
- Partly to predict future developments
- Conservatives did not want a repeat of their broken promise of a
‘home fit for heroes’ after WW1
- Clear feeling the war being fought to deliver a better world and a
more systematic, inclusive welfare system was fundamental.
Aims of the Beveridge report:
- Protection for all ‘from the cradle to the grave’.
- Tackle the five giants of
-
Want (through national insurance)
-
Disease (through the NHS)
-
Ignorance (through better education)
-
Squalor (by rehousing)
-
Idleness (through the maintenance of full employment).
- Beveridge wanted the provision of the state welfare to be
centralised, regulated and systematically organised.
- State welfare should be funded entirely by a compulsory single
insurance payment- Beveridge did not anticipate extra government spending
on welfare and under his scheme wanted to avoid any 'means-tested'
assistance payments and the rise of the santa clause state (given
everything for nothing) as a liberal he didn’t want the system to
incentivise dependence on the state.
Although his findings were not new, his report
drew together the many findings that had taken place and presented them as a
coherent, consolidated programme for post-war reconstruction.
The report was extremely
popular:
- 635 000 copies were sold
- Popularity also explained by timing; winning the war made these
prospects seem realistic and achievable.
- Copies were even dropped over Germany to encourage the civilian
population to demand peace.
The Atlee government
The labour party won
the 1945 election with the slogan ‘let’s face the future’. They promised to
implement the recommendations of the Beveridge report and introduce a welfare
state in Britain.
Acts of Parliament that laid the foundations for the Welfare State.
Date of Act
|
Name of Act
|
Objective
|
1944
|
The Education
Act
(AKA Butler Act)
|
Compulsory
free education. Introduced tripartite system; after selection by exam aged
11, children were sent to either a grammar, modern or technical school.
|
1945
|
Family Allowances Act
|
Provided weekly payments for
every child after the first. Money was paid directly to the mother. By 1949
88% of those entitled to family allowance had applied for it.
|
1946
|
National
Insurance Act
|
Created a compulsory
system to help pay for pensions and benefits for the unemployed. Payments made by the employer, employee and
government. Payments would be made in times of sickness, unemployment,
maternity expenses, widowhood and retirement. The
‘Family guide to National Insurance’ was a free leaflet that was sent to 14
million homes to encourage them to be insured.
|
1946
|
National Health Service Act
|
Brought the whole population
into a scheme of free medical and hospital treatment.
|
1946
|
The Industrial
Injuries Act
|
Provided cover
for accidents that happened at work
|
1948
|
National Assistance Act
|
Set up boards to deal with
hardship and poverty. This new
board did not have a vigorous form of means-testing and so was popular.
|
Other changes:
HOUSING
-
700,000
homes been destroyed in the war
-
230,000
houses were built a year by 1948 (however 240,000 were needed to eliminate
homelessness)
-
1945-51 1
million homes were built.
-
4 in every
5 homes were built by the state. - Policies o
-
Pre-fabricated
homes were a key focus for speed - around 150,000 prefabs were built.
-
Licences
to produce homes were limited in order to achieve quality.
-
1946 New
Towns act created new towns, moving people out of overcrowded cities.
NATIONALISATION
-
Between
1946 and 49 – coal, civil aviation, cable, wireless, the Bank of England, road
transport, electricity, gas, railways, iron and steel, were all nationalised.
EDUCATION
-
900
primary schools built (for baby boom)
-
Only 250
secondary schools
-
School
leaving age raised to 15
Issues with the welfare state
· The BMA were initially opposed to the creation
of the NHS, it took Bevan persistence and ‘stuffing their mouths with gold’ to
get doctors to agree to work for the NHS
·
NHS costs
rose year on year instead of decreasing - 1949 The Health budget was £597
billion, or 4.1% or GDP
·
The
welfare state was expensive - Labour had rejected Beveridge’s call for welfare
payments to be funded solely through insurance
· Nationalisation meant the government now had to
bear the costs of failing industries
Challenges to the welfare state
1964-1979
Changes to welfare
· 1959
National Insurance Act -
introduced a top up scheme based on earnings
· 1971
Family Income Support Program -
provided family allowance for the first child
· 1975
Social Security Act
Rising costs of welfare
· Cost of unemployment benefits rose from 0.6% of
GDP in 1939 to 8.8% in 1980
· Baby booms in the late 50s and 60s - 900 000
births per year - meant higher care and education costs for children
· Increase in average life expectancy between
1940 and 1970 (from 64 to 74 for women and 59 to 69 for men) meant a larger
burden on the welfare state
· New social groups not covered by the Beveridge
report emerged like low-wage earning families and single parent families
· Higher living standards prompted demands for a
higher minimum standard of life for the poor - with absolute poverty tackled,
people focused on how relative poverty could be eased
· Growing size of the welfare state (by end of
70s welfare spending equated to around 6.5% of GDP) required ever more
beurocracy to make it work
Increased criticisms of
welfare
· While spending on welfare increased just as
much under Conservative governments as under Labour, criticisms of the welfare
state emerged from the right during the 70s
·
Margaret
Thatcher was a key critic of the welfare state, she feared benefit payments
created a poverty trap and encouraged dependence on the state
·
Many also
felt that the welfare-state was unsustainable with the poor state of the
economy, and commitment to full employment was fuelling inflation
·
On the
other hand the left were angry about the persistence of privilege in healthcare
and education, attacked welfare as inadequate and thought more should be done
to combat relative poverty.
Comments
Post a Comment